WARNING: Graphic Images
- Cynthia Randolph deliberately shut her toddlers, aged 16 months and 24 months, in a hot car to “teach them a lesson” for not leaving the car when she wanted . Believing the toddlers could get themselves out, Randolph went into the house, smoked some marijuana, and slept for 2-3 hours. The temperature outside that Texas day reached 96 degrees. The toddlers did not survive. Randolph is being held on $200,000 bond.
- Aramazd Andressian killed his 5 y.o. son “Piqui” after a trip to Disneyland . Andressian and the boy’s mother had been in the midst of a highly contested divorce. Andressian alternately threatened to take the boy to Cuba, Iran, or Armenia. The child’s body was found after a two-month search involving rescue personnel, volunteers, and cadaver dogs. Andressian has since pleaded guilty.
The majority of child victims who die at the hands of their parents are under five years of age . More than a third are under the age of one. Men murder six out of ten of these children, most often by beating or shooting them.
To “Teach Them a Lesson”
Some 700 children have died in hot cars in the last 20 years . Over half the time, these children were forgotten by their caregivers. About 17% of the time, children were intentionally left in the car by an adult, as was the case with the Randolph toddlers.
One might be tempted to blame Cynthia Randolph’s stupidity for her children’s deaths (raising the possibility of an affirmative defense of diminished capacity). But Randolph was capable of devising several stories, in an effort to exculpate herself, before disclosing the facts. The deaths have been ruled homicides .
It would seem that Cynthia Randolph is the one who would have benefited from lessons.
Aramazd Andressian went a step further. He killed his son from sheer self-centeredness. The vast majority of “family annihilators”, i.e. those who kill their immediate family, are men . These men come from all backgrounds. Most show no outward signs that violence is imminent.
It may be that Andressian did not distinguish between his son and himself. Perhaps he could not envision a future for the boy without him. This is selfishness in the guise of altruism. Or perhaps Andressian simply wanted to inflict maximum pain on his wife. Continue reading