Brock Turner, a Stanford University athlete with Olympic aspirations, was convicted in March of sexually assaulting an unconscious woman at a fraternity party. Turner was caught in the act, and chased down by two witnesses.
Though facing up to 14 years in prison, Turner received a six-month sentence . Even this slap on the wrist was viewed as excessive by his father. Dan Turner had opined, in a letter to the court, that jail time would be “a steep price to pay for 20 minutes of action” .
While it is difficult to overstate the sheer stupidity of this remark, the remark itself is extremely revealing. Clearly, here is a father who taught his son nothing about ethics or morality, since he himself cannot grasp the violation that occurred. Evidently, women are merely to be viewed as sexual conquests…a convenience – like party favors – particularly if they are unconscious during the assault.
Why should a Stanford man, the cream of the crop (at least in his own eyes), be deprived of sex on demand by a little thing like consent? A technicality, really. The girl should have been grateful for 20 minutes of his attention.
What are 20 minutes out of a woman’s life anyway? All she has to do is open her legs. How much can that matter? It’s not as if she has value, let alone rights.
“He will never be his happy go lucky self with that easy going personality and welcoming smile,” the elder Turner concluded. One cannot help but wonder whether the rape victim will ever be her happy go lucky self again either.
And whether the Turner women view things quite the same way.
 A petition bearing 1 million signatures has been submitted to the California state legislature, seeking to impeach Judge Aaron Persky.
 Washington Post, “‘A steep price to pay for 20 minutes of action’: Dad defends Stanford sex offender” by Michael E. Miller, 6/6/16, http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/%E2%80%98a-steep-price-to-pay-for-20-minutes-of-action-dad-defends-stanford-sex-offender/ar-BBtUZpE?ocid=ansmsnnews11.